[Up]
Spatial Syntax Analysis
Purpose: This analysis method is designed to identify the topology
of social relationships, how people are organized in space. It is adapted from Hillier and
Hanson's Gamma Analysis as described in The Social Logic of Space . It can be used
to see who inhabits positions of power and who does not. It can also be used to understand
the accessibility of individuals to each other and the degree of freedom in circulation
between points.
Definitions:
The syntax of space, i.e. the organization of its individual
units, determines the relationships between individuals in a social unit. Spatial
relations influence the level of access between individuals and the level of control each
can have over one another.
Inhabitants are those in whom power is vested, i.e. the
controllers, whereas visitors are those who enter and stay as subjects of the
controllers. In some cases ("reversed buildings" like prisons), the visitors may
actually spend more time in the building than the inhabitants.
The carrier is the context outside the boundaries of the
system being graphed, e.g. the exterior of a building.
A justified graph is a diagramming technique for revealing
the topology of a spatial organization. A justified graph organizes the spaces in a
building in relationship to each other with the carrier at the bottom and the other spaces
arranged in rows above corresponding to the number of steps in from the carrier.
Graphing conventions:
- the carrier represented by a single point (0)
- each space represented by a point (numbered 1-n)
- physical connections through doors and passageways are diagrammed as
solid lines between two spaces (points)
- visual connections through openings or interior windows are
diagrammed as dotted lines
- stairways are considered individual spaces
Types of spatial relationships:
Asymmetrical spatial relationships
Two or more spaces (points) have indirect relationships
with each other
Leads to "tree-like" graphs

Symmetrical spatial relationships
Two or more spaces (points) have direct relationships
with each other
Leads to "ringy" graphs

Spatial syntax calculations:
1. Depth
Number of lines to a point from the "carrier" or
any other point of reference
Calculate by counting the number of steps (solid lines) in
from the carrier
Calculation of mean depth:
MD = (d1+d2+d3....dn)/(P-1)
where
MD is mean depth
dn is the depth of a point
P is the total number of points, including the "carrier

2. Relative Asymmetry
Measure of tree-like quality of a justified graph
Calculation:
RAn= 2(MD-1)/(P-1)
Can be calculated from any point

3. Relative Ringiness at a Point
Measure of ringiness for any point on a justified graph
Calculation:
RRn= R/(P-1)
where
RRn is the relative ringiness at a point
R is the number of independent rings passing through a point; an
independent ring shares only one link with other rings
P is the total number of points in the graph, including the carrier

4. Control
Each space has n neighbors
Each space gives 1/n control to each neighbor
The control value (E) for any point is the sum of values for
each receiving space
Examples below:

Patterns of spatial organization to consider in the analysis:
- level of control over access along the links
- territorial control over links to the carrier
- visual/auditory links providing control without contact and can
subvert or reinforce the physical topology
- "shallow" buildings are the more socially integrated with
the community (carrier) than "deep" buildings
- "shallow buildings" have more dense traffic
- tree-like buildings have more opportunities for social control
- the deeper the point, the greater the power of the inhabitant
- in "inverted buildings", power relationships are reversed
and spaces are highly segregated between inhabitant and visitor, e.g. prison
Analysis steps:
- Determine the carrier and the boundaries of the system to be mapped
- Obtain or draw a plan of the building or area (does not have to be to
scale)
- Overlay a graph of spaces and connections on top of the plan
(physical links only)
- Justify the graph by organizing points in steps in from the carrier
or other point of reference
- Compute statistics on depth, asymmetry, ringiness, etc.
- Consider the impact of visual/auditory links
- Repeat using different orientations of the graph (starting at
different points) to obtain alternate perspectives (e.g. different users)
Note: See example from Hillier and Hanson in the reading.
Documentation:
- plan with overlaid graph, including numbered spaces and a key of
space names
- justified graphs as needed
- calculations
- descriptions of the impact of visual/auditory links
- implications that the spatial syntax has for the social life of the
building
Note: comparative calculations are particularly useful in the
calculations, e.g. what if the plan were organized differently? Photographs or sketches
can be helpful in communication as well.
Analsyis #3:
Complete a spatial syntax diagram (justified graph) of the first
floor of your case study building. Calculate the mean depth, relative asymmetry and
relative ringiness. Identify the points of highest control value.
Be prepared to discuss the following in class:
- Is the building symmetrical/asymmetrical?
- Is it ringy or tree like?
- What are the key control spaces and how important are they in the use
of the building?
- What are the implications of the spatial syntax for social life in
the building? For the different inhabitants and visitors?
- How would you have designed it differently and why?
Go to Top
|