These reports were distributed over the Big Heads electronic discussion list in the weeks prior to the Philadelphia, PA Midwinter meeting.
This compilation was prepared by Judith Hopkins, University at Buffalo
Columbia University
Cornell University
Duke University
Indiana University
Library of Congress
National Agricultural Library
National Library of Medicine
New York University
Northwestern University
Ohio State University
Princeton University
Stanford University
University of California at Berkeley
University of California at Los Angeles
University of Chicago
University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
University of Michigan
University of Minnesota
University of Pennsylvania
University of Texas at Austin
University of Wisconsin at Madison
Yale University
From: Lee Leighton lleighto@library.berkeley.edu
I am currently serving as the Associate University Librarian for Access Services, which includes Technical Services, Preservation, Interlibrary Services, and circulation for the main and undergraduate libraries. Armanda Barone, who was the Assistant Director of Technical Services, is the Interim Head of Technical Services.
UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO UPDATE , January 1999
Not included in this conversion project are unique Crerar Library collections (approximately 120,000 titles) and East Asia Library collections (approximately 175,000 titles). Conversion of the Crerar collection has already started. A pilot project to assess options and cost for conversion of the East Asia collections is to begin soon.
Judith Nadler
Assistant Director for Technical Services
University of Chicago Library
773 702-8743
FAX 773 702-6623
judi@midway.uchicago.edu
In other changes, Rick Block became Head of Original and Special Materials Cataloging in January (coming to us from the Metropolitan Museum of Art). In Preservation, Maria Fredericks has joined us as Conservator and Head of the Conservation Laboratory. Meanwhile, we have begun recruiting for Head of Serials Acquisitions, and are actively recruiting for Archives Processing Coordinator. (Because of the impact of digital library and metadata initiatives, the latter position reports jointly to the Rare Book & Manuscript Library and to Bibliographic Control.)
With others, we've been exploring different options for analyzing the content of aggregator databases, but have yet to find a model that is both practicable and truly serves users' needs. (In short, presenting the user with 27 paths to various online incarnations of the Wall St. Journal is not our desired outcome.) We're hoping further discussions via CONSER and Big Heads will help to define this problem and point towards a broad-based solution.
-- Bob Wolven
From: Christian M. Boissonnas cmb3@cornell.edu
This is in no particular order.
Are injuries down? We believe so, but we won't really know for a while. The changeover happened just last summer.
Another problem that we have begun to deal with is version control of the various software packages and clients that we use. We are in the process of developing a procedure to make sure that software is updated on a department-wide basis once it has passed testing by our Information Technology Librarian.
" The Virtual Carrel project at Mann Library grew out of a sense that the Library Gateway is both "too big and too small." It is "too big" in that most users use a relatively small number of resources. They either have to search to find these resources in the Gateway each time they want to use them, or they bookmark the resources. The problem with bookmarks is that they "don't travel"--they are stored on a single machine. Also, if users begin to rely on their bookmarks, they may get "cut off" from the Library and not be aware of new resources being added that may be of interest. Users may also tend to overlook broader, more general resources categorized as "General Interest and Reference" when they look in the Gateway under a specific discipline. On the other hand, the Gateway is "too small" in that there are resources of interest to users that are not included within it. Nor is it possible for users to annotate resources or add other personal notes. The Virtual Carrel as it has been conceived to date would be a set of "traveling bookmarks" along with a "traveling librarian." It would allow users to compile a set of library and non-library resources, add personal notes, etc., but also maintain a "library presence." For example, the Library would alert users when new resources are added in their area of interest. Mann had originally tried to implement a Virtual Carrel in September but decided that its prototype was not ready for prime time and it stepped back, looked around at what other institutions were doing along these lines and came up with a list of ideas. They are now ready to test these ideas with users in order to better define and prioritize the personal services the Library should provide.
The software development process is an important aspect of the Virtual Carrel project. Mann chose to use an approach called Unified Modeling Language (UML). UML is intended to make the design and implementation of new software more formal and more efficient. Testing the use of UML is a second goal of the project...."
From: "Lubans, John" jl@mail.lib.duke.edu
Duke University Technical Services Round Robin Response
Technical Services staff will take these results to another retreat to refine and focus the outcomes to more specific working goals and arrangements. We will want to distill and plan around what we will be doing less of and what we will be doing more of.
In May of 1998, Duke's Collection Council charged the Cataloging Web Sites Task Force to develop a policy statement about the library catalog's purpose vis a vis Web resources. The task force report was compiled, and a trial project is now underway, beginning in November 1998. The Report of the Cataloging Web Sites Task Force may be found at: http://www.lib.duke.edu/ejournal/catweb.htm
As part of the test project on cataloging selected Internet resources, Systems developed an URL link checker process. URLs found in the 856 field were extracted as files and loaded into a set of HTML pages. Running MomSpider, all URLs were checked and problem links identified. The initial run checked nearly 12,000 links in the catalog, and identified some 375 "problem links". Most of these were from GPO records, resulting from reorganized government web sites or typographical errors.
From: Barbara Henigman henigman@uiuc.edu
The reorganization has also revitalized the Cataloging Policy Advisory Committee which, under the direction of the Original Cataloging Team Leader, is now responsible for all cataloging policy, training, and implementation of technical services related systems and software. New cataloging policy has been established to use Core level cataloging for all copy cataloging and issues involving backlogs and retrospective conversion are being addressed. The UIUC library is also involved in a space reconfiguration project which involves the Technical Services Division.
From: Michael Kaplan mkaplan@indiana.edu
Indiana University Libraries Update
We now have a departmental programmer doing some work that will allow us to upload approval plan files (which we receive weekly from the vendors via FTP). As we sub-profile these plans we can move onto the next step: shelf-ready. This will allow us to test it in a somewhat controlled environment before we move on.
We're in the process of creating our own LC/GPO resource file. The bibliographic records have been partially loaded. We'll be loading the complete LC name authority file next week (or so).
Library of Congress Update
Following a standard source selection process, the Library ordered two Sun servers for our Voyager system, one for the main system and the other for Web access.
A major milestone came on Jan. 8, 1999 when the first full test load of LC's bibliographic and authority records (nearly 16 million records) was successfully loaded; the loading was error free. Additional test loads are planned before the full production load, now planned for May or June 1999. The Library has a tentative schedule for staff to start using the ILS, with cataloging operations going first in May or June, then circulation and reference in July, and in October, acquisitions and serials check-in.
An External Coordination Policy Group continues work to stay in touch with external stakeholders and to negotiate implementation timetables and issues.
An extensive training plan was originally prepared as part of the ILS Implementation Plan submitted to Congress in April 1998 and continues to be revised.
For more information, please contact Barbara Tillett, ILS Program
Director,
via email:
btil@loc.gov,
telephone: (202) 707-4714,
or
fax: (202) 707-4719.
To date, more than 100 electronic works have been cataloged; these records can be accessed via the BEOnline Web site. In addition, approximately 45 records for print versions have been enhanced to inform researchers of Internet equivalents or related works.
The project is largely automated and involves use of "off-the-shelf" desktop computer and scanning equipment and conventional software, supplemented with the applications programs developed by Library staff. The HTML meta-tags -- which contain key words and other index terms -- are also being encoded in the TOC files, so that a user conducting a general Web search anywhere can find a TOC file, and through the links built into the TOC file, be pointed in turn to the actual bibliographic record as well as access to other related works in the LC catalog. Both the MARC records themselves and the linked TOC data may be viewed through a Web browser by accessing the Library's online catalog access options, available at URL http://lcWeb.loc.gov/catalog
LC will begin creating subject subdivision records and recoding form subdivisions in existing subject authority records after Jan. 20. According to current projections, LC staff will begin coding form subdivisions as $v in LC subject headings assigned to bibliographic records on Feb. 16, 1999. More information on subject authority data elements and form/genre implementation is posted on the CPSO Web page.
This change was recommended by the PCC Task Group on Name vs. Subject Authorities and an ARLIS/NA task force on the handling of individual works of art.
For the latest information about the Program for Cooperative Cataloging and its components, please consult the PCC homepage at URL http://lcWeb.loc.gov/catdir/pcc.
The Serials Cataloging Cooperative Training Program is well under way. Cameron Campbell (University of Chicago) is preparing materials for the first course in basic serials cataloging and a number of catalogers have applied to be trainers. An information session on the Program will be held Friday, Jan. 29, 7:00 - 9:00 p.m., Philadelphia Marriott, Salon K. The deadline for training applications is February 15, 1999.
The core bibliographic record was defined by the Program for Cooperative Cataloging and CONSER to establish a national standard that is less complete than full cataloging but substantially more complete than minimal-level cataloging. All core bibliographic records include a classification number and one or two subject access points where appropriate; all name, series, and subject access points are supported by appropriate authority work. The Library of Congress will include some data elements, in addition to PCC requirements, in all core level records it produces or copies:
OCLC Forest Press will issue Dewey for Windows (DFW) Version 1.2 this January. This version of DFW features new built numbers and accompanying index terms available only in the DFW format. The new built numbers include comprehensive numbers for Native American peoples and popular topics in Computer science, Literature, and Life sciences. DFW 1.2 also integrates all DDC corrections and changes made since the appearance of Edition 21 in 1996, including the revised area table for Great Britain and the Republic of South Africa.
The Library has also begun to draft program specifications to help RLG prepare a computer program which will perform as much of the conversion as possible. The program should also be able to change headings for the most frequently used Chinese conventional place names.
Advance copies of new Chinese romanization guidelines based on the pinyin system were distributed to institutions and organizations in November. The new guidelines will generally follow standard Chinese pinyin romanization procedures, with certain exceptions. Words of non-Chinese origin will be romanized systematically in all cases. Tones will not be indicated. The Library will continue its practice of separating individual syllables, except in the cases of personal names, geographic locations, and certain proper nouns. This approach assures that converted LC records will maintain their consistency with those found on both utilities. The separation of syllables should also facilitate international exchange of Chinese bibliographic data in the future.
The Library's Pinyin Task Group has begun the task of identifying and assessing the many effects of pinyin conversion on subject headings and classification schemes. Major changes are being anticipated in the DS, G and PL schedules. Class numbers will be retained whenever possible, and the reference structure will be utilized in the classification schedule to lead the user to the proper location. Subject catalogers have begun to locate and evaluate subject headings containing terms in Wade-Giles romanization. Regarding classification, for Chinese literary authors in the PL schedule, the Library plans to end the most recent time period this year (1949-1999); beginning with 2000, cuttering will be based upon the new pinyin system of romanization.
Decisions on conversion of authority records will be made following the implementation of the Library's new integrated library system (ILS).
Bibliographic Records | FY98 | FY97 |
---|---|---|
LC Full-Level Cataloging | 175,103 | 177,448 |
Copy Cataloging | 39,265 | 43,744 |
Minimal-Level Cataloging | 24,880 | 35,612 |
Collection-Level Cataloging | 2,965 | 2,863 |
TOTAL records created | 242,213 | 259,067 |
TOTAL volumes cataloged | 274,890 | 289,154 |
Authority Records | FY98 | FY97 |
---|---|---|
Names | 167,441* | 108,089 |
Series | 9,713 | 9,965 |
Subjects | 7,194 | 8,132 |
TOTAL | 184,348 | 126,186 |
*includes 64,194 machine-generated Names
For more information contact:
Beacher J. Wiggins
Director for
Cataloging
Library of Congress, LM 642
Washington, DC 20540-4300
telephone:
202-707-5333 or
Internet:
bwig@loc.gov.
Collections policy statements on children's literature and on all areas of science and technology were approved; a policy on collecting electronic resources was drafted and submitted for approval. The China Working Group evaluated and took action to improve the collection of contemporary Chinese social science, science, and technology.
Given the effective operation of its mass deacidification program
in recent years, the Library is serving as a demonstration site for
managers and technical staff from other libraries, archives, and cultural
institutions who are interested in learning firsthand about
administrative and workflow procedures required for mass deacidification
programs. Interested organizations should contact
Kenneth E. Harris
Preservation Projects Director
Preservation Directorate
Library of Congress, LM-G21
Washington, DC 20540-4500
Telephone: (202) 707-1054
Fax: (202) 707-3434
email: khar@loc.gov
/OL>
UCLA Update
UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN From: "Beth Forrest Warner" bwarner@umich.edu
We started purchase of Table of Contents records from BNA and loaded our first batch of records in January.
We will participate in the OCLC's CORC Project. A project team has met once and developed a short list of possible projects.
Barbara A. Stelmasik
Mailto:b-stel@tc.umn.edu
Team Leader, Materials Acquisition and Control
University of Minnesota Libraries
160 Wilson Library
http://www.lib.umn.edu/ts/
309-19th Ave. So.
Minneapolis, MN 55455
Phone: 612-625-8074
Fax: 612-625-3428
From: Carton Rogers rogers@pobox.upenn.edu
Subject: Update From the University of Pennsylvania
Since our last meeting...
Phase Four of the Van Pelt/Dietrich Library Center renovation was completed this Fall. The main entrance and the public desks (Circ/Reference/Current Periodicals/Microforms) were repositioned and renovated. Many additional workstations and study spaces were added, as well. The response from users has been universally positive except for the columnist in the student newspaper who complained that we hadn't refurbished the rest rooms! There may be a lesson in that...
Report from the National Agricultural Library, January 1999
To assist document delivery staff in retrieving requested materials, all in-process serial titles awaiting cataloging were assigned call numbers and shelved with the cataloged titles in the collection. Access to the relocated in-process titles is through the temporary bibliographic record in the catalog. Once the in-process titles were all cataloged or relocated to the stacks, new throughput goals were implemented for full level serials cataloging. The goal is to complete the cataloging and review of all titles within 5 working days.
NAL/NIH START DIETARY SUPPLEMENTS WEBSITE
IBIDS, the International Bibliographic Information on Dietary Supplements,
database on the Internet was unveiled to the public by NAL and the
National Institutes of Health in January 1999. The site
(www.nal.usda.gov/fnic/IBIDS/) contains citations to international
scientific literature on dietary supplements from 1986 to the present.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Sally Sinn
Associate Director, Technical Services Division
National Agricultural Library
Beltsville, MD 20705
Phone: 301-504-7294
Fax: 301-504-6951
E-mail: ssinn@nal.usda.gov
As part of this effort, NLM selected Voyager as the Library's new integrated library system to support its basic library functions. Voyager replaces a number of internal custom-built systems developed at NLM over the last 25 years. Numerous other NLM applications, including DOCLINE and SERHOLD and the creation of journal article citations for MEDLINE will rely on the bibliographic data in the Voyager ILS.
On November 30, 1998 the first phase of the ILS implementation began with the release of the beta version of Voyager 98.1 for use by NLM staff for cataloging and acquisitions work. Over the next few months, additional modules will be implemented. We expect to have the WEB-based OPAC available for public use in early 1999.
NLM staff have been working with Endeavor to add new features to the product, including a binding module and enhancements to the closed stack request module and serials processing to meet NLM's internal processing requirements.
As a library which has always built its own custom-built systems, moving to a commercial library system is a big change with trade-offs for NLM. In addition to the more modern client/server technology used by Voyager, the library will gain some functionality such as EDI processing and hot links to the Web from the OPAC, which would have difficult, if not impossible to achieve with our old systems. On the downside, we have to adjust to working with a system that is not under our direct design control.
As Roxanne reported for Northwestern, Voyager implementation has dominated the lives of TSD staff over the past few months. On the whole, data conversion, including the conversion of vendor records and order records for monographs, went smoothly. However even a smooth conversion and initial implementation meant several weeks lost production time. A processing backlog has built up and continues to grow as staff learn to use the new system.
Like Northwestern, we find that "normal" day to day technical services work takes longer, and we too are employing some temporary additional staff. Finally I have to whole heartedly agree with Roxanne that setting up to do predictive check in for serials is a truly monumental task!
Based on the MeSH structure and the way it is implemented by Indexing, Cataloging will no longer use the traditional heading string. Instead the subject matter will be expressed by a main heading or main heading and topical subheading combinations. Geographic relationships, bibliographic format, and language are no longer part of the main heading or main and topical subheading. The headings relating to the first two are carried in the appropriate MARC field (651 geographic and 655 genre). Language is no longer used to qualify a subject since it is contained in the record.
For subscribers to NLM's bibliographic database the heading string will be reconstructed in output for distribution.
The goals of next generation SERHOLD are to provide holdings data to support routing of ILL transactions, to improve the quality and timeliness of holdings data by empowering all SERHOLD participants to view and maintain data online, to facilitate the exchange of data by conforming to national standards (USMARC, ANSI/NISO Z39.71-199X), and to provide SERHOLD services and products in a resource effective manner.
Testing is scheduled to begin in March. We hope to demonstrate parts of the new system at the Medical Library Association meeting in May and to put the system into production about July 1.
From: ARNO KASTNER arno.kastner@nyu.edu
Arno Kastner
Director of Technical Services
Bobst Library
New York University
70 Washington Square South
New York, NY 10012
voice:212-998-2477
email:arno.kastner@nyu.edu
From: Roxanne Sellberg sellberg@nwu.edu
What is happening at Northwestern?
First, we lost the equivalent of several weeks production in acquisitions and cataloging during the implementation itself. This was to be expected. Unfortunately we have not been able to make any headway against the backlogs that were created during that time. In fact, we are continuing to grow backlogs of high priority work, including new monographic orders and copy cataloging of new monographs. What we consider normal day-to-day technical services work simply takes longer with the new system. And, we don't any longer have the benefit of some of the time-saving software Gary Strawn had designed to work with NOTIS. In order to reverse the trend or at least stem the tide, we are trying to employ some additional staff, at least temporarily. In the longer term, we will need to change the way we work more fundamentally to take advantage of Voyager's strengths, such as EDI. We also hope to create other automated systems which supplement Voyager. For instance, Gary has already created a separate system for spine labeling which uses Voyager database information but not the Voyager software for creating the labels.
Second, we have not yet been able to take advantage of Voyager's serials control features. In order to set the system up to do predictive check in and claiming of active serials, we need to create Voyager purchase orders and subscription patterns for them. This is proving to be a monumental project which will require huge amounts of skilled staff time for as far into the future as we can see. At some point we will get this startup work done for enough titles that we we will start to see the benefits of the new system. At this point, however, this serials startup work is simply taking staff time away from cataloging and acquisitions production work.
The librarian we are seeking will be Head of the Serials Department and Coordinator of Acquisitions. I will be sending a job description to the Big Heads list, and I hope you will alert and/or nominate qualified librarians.
The Head will lead the Serials Department, and coordinate acquisitions activities taking place in both the Serials Department and the MARC Department. Responsibilities will include supervision of the Serials staff; monitoring book and serials expenditures; coordination of blanket order and approval programs; vendor selection, negotiation, and evaluation; managing licenses for electronic resources. The Head will play an important leadership role throughout the Library, working especially closely with the Head of the MARC Department, the Head of the Business and Finance Department, and the AUL for Collection Management.
Looking forward to seeing you next week.
Roxanne
Roxanne Sellberg
Assistant University Librarian for Technical Services
Northwestern University Library
1935 Sheridan Road
Evanston IL 60208
tel: (847)467-5359
fax: (847)491-8306
e-mail: sellberg@nwu.edu
From: Carol Diedrichs diedrichs.1@osu.edu
The Ohio State University Libraries
HIGHLIGHTS FOR BIGHEADS
January, 1999
After initial implementation, OSU plans to implement GOBI for order request and selection by our collection managers. The OhioLINK view of the system will allow them to see what their colleagues around the state are doing and, we hope, make better informed decisions on marginal titles.
MICROFORMS Good progress has been made on the approximately 125,526 records for major microform sets purchased on our behalf by OhioLINK. The work to get these titles ready for circulation is progressing. For the titles which have already been made available to the public (locally and statewide), we have seen a substantial increase in loan requests particularly from our OhioLINK colleagues.
From: "Richard J. Schulz" rjschulz@princeton.edu
Princeton Big Heads Report, January 1999
Plans to move acquisitions and serial control off Geac have now come to the fore. However, where (i.e., to which system) and how (i.e., whether as a whole or in part) have not yet been decided. A number of scenarios at this stage are possible, including moving to NOTIS to complete data integration and temporize until a desirable client-server solution is available. We expect to be concentrating efforts on this front through the first half of 1999, initially reviewing the current status of systems which were of greatest interest to us as a result of a major evaluation effort conducted at ALA last summer.
Recon production hit stride in October rising to a level of 65,000 to 75,000 records or more produced monthly by OCLC. After working through one data loading problem after another throughout the summer and fall of 1998, we were finally able to see the fruits of this labor in our own OPAC in December. Most of the data loading problems revolved around ensuring the overlay and replacement of the bibliographic segment of sub-standard circulation records migrated earlier from Geac as noted above. From the start of the production phase of the project in April 1998, through December 1998 slightly over 440,000 records have been converted with half of them overlaying Geac derived records. This represents slightly more than 30% of an estimated total of 1.4 million records to convert. At current production rates, we estimate that the project will be 95% complete by the end of 1999. This will be just in time to take full advantage of the anticipated new remote storage library.
Princeton has been a SACO participant for over 2 years, but is still only making a modest contribution in this area. Probably the most widely used of our subjects so far is "Euro" (the new currency, sh 98003388). BIBCO contribution is also somewhat modest with the production of just over 3000 PCC Full records since we joined last June. The chief impediment to achieving a greater level of contribution to BIBCO continues to be the inability to use the NAF as a Princeton series authority file, specifically not being able to indicate our local decision and treatment information for series where we may have historically diverged from the Library of Congress. Though we have historically always made the effort to conform to LC practice with regard to choice and form of series entry, and since becoming a NACO participant have also attempted to stay in conformity with regard to decision and treatment as well, the current BIBCO/NAF situation requires us to perform a two-search process to either establish or verify all series on new cataloging which we have determined is too much of a productivity drag for us to accommodate.
NACO, SACO, BIBCO are more than ever integral parts of the cataloging environment, i.e. we have eliminated most of the vestiges of special staff, organization and/or handling associated with these aspects of what is now very much the cataloging routine at Princeton, emphasis on the word "routine." As noted above, catalogers now do their own online NACO production analogous to and integrated with their online cataloging production. The only formal allocation of staff to managing the process is 50% of one cataloger's time as Authorities Coordinator supported by an Authorities Committee with rotating membership among professional catalogers which oversees production and quality control. The Authorities Coordinator is also responsible for the Arabic NACO funnel project.
Furthermore, I expect major changes in the department this year as we attempt to reorient our focus away from a function based and toward a process based organizational approach. My hope and intention is that this will be very much a "grass roots" effort involving wide spread staff participation with minimal direction provided by myself. The object is to position ourselves better to implement and take full advantage of a new integrated system and create efficiencies to allow reallocation of staff resources either within Technical Services or elsewhere if need be.
Stanford Update
January 25, 1999
*******************************************************
Catherine Tierney
Asst. Univ. Librarian for Technical Services
Stanford University Libraries
Stanford, CA 94305-6004
650.723.2015 (voice)
650.725.4902 (fax)
From: Sue Phillips s.phillips@mail.utexas.edu
From The University of Texas at Austin --
On Feb. 12, an online version of the Handbook of Texas, a six volume set published in 1996 by the Texas State Historical Association, will be announced. The General Libraries is supporting the technical infrastructure, with the editorial control residing with the Association. Thanks to foundation support, this resource will be freely available to all.
Given preliminary indications of support from the Texas Telecommunication Infrastructure Fund, staff from the UT Austin General Libraries and Humanities Research Center, working with the Texas State Library, are preparing a multi-stage proposal to convert archival finding aids to EAD standards throughout Texas libraries. The initial phase would convert those finding aids held by Texas ARL libraries.
Responsibility for the University of Texas System Digital Library and TexShare electronic services continue to reside with the General Libraries. Our committment of staff resources to statewide cooperative projects of all types remains strong.
From: Richard Reeb REEB@macc.wisc.edu
From: Joan Swanekamp joan.swanekamp@yale.edu
Update from Yale University
In the course of the past six months, technical services librarians and department heads have participated in a variety of working groups that have established selection, processing workflow, and preservation procedures for the new facility. Of particular concern to the technical services program has been the process to identify new acquisitions that may be targeted for immediate shelving off-campus; procedures for ensuring the integrity, accuracy, and appropriateness of the bibliographic records for transferred materials; and procedures for ensuring that fragile items are not damaged during processing from the home library, transfer to the LSF, and processing into the LSF. The Library Shelving Facility may be unique in the United States in one important aspect: every item transferred to LSF is cleaned at the point of receipt and prior to final processing into the facility. This procedure was instituted, along with rigorous custodial maintenance of the facility itself, to help insure that the shelving module remains relatively dust-free in the coming decades.
Work continues toward our goal of normalizing the flow of materials between acquisitions, the curatorial units and the catalog department.
We are now close to completing the initial implementation phase of OCLC's Authority Control Service.
An electronic resources cataloging committee has been appointed to address the wide range of issues associated with electronic resources. They will be working with the Service Quality Improvement Council to address the question of how to assess our effectiveness in dealing with these resources. We have also signed on as a participant in OCLC's CORC project.
Vickie Seymour, Acquisition Department Head, is also serving as Interim Director of Social Sciences Library and Information Services.
Augmenting resources to support the treatment or rare and general circulating collections remains a high priority. The Beinecke Rare Book and Manuscript Library funded two new conservation technician positions in the Conservation Program. A programmatic shift in the way pamphlet binding activities are carried out in the Collections Care Program freed 1.5 FTE conservation technicians to increase the attention given to the repair of circulating collections. The NEH brittle books preservation program is also giving renewed attention to protecting the integrity of microfilmed volumes; less than five percent of microfilmed British History materials are withdrawn after filming .
New Preservation initiatives begun in the department since the ALA annual meeting include the development of a comprehensive Sterling stack maintenance program and initial commitments to undertake the mass deacidification of acidic but not-yet-brittle collections. The stack maintenance program largely centers on cleaning books and shelves following the stack tower renovation. The department has launched a systematic, eight-year program to completely clean the contents of main library on campus that presently holds about 4.5 million volumes. Resources permitting, the maintenance program will also tackle pervasive but low-level collections maintenance problems, including the replacement of brittle pamphlet boxes, and simple spine cloth repairs, enclosures for individual brittle pamphlets.
Beginning this spring, Yale will begin making weekly shipments to Preservation Technologies, Inc., in Pittsburgh, which is the firm that holds the franchise for the BookKeeper mass deacidification technology. The scope of the program will initially be small but is designed to scale up as resources become available. In the past six months, Preservation Department staff conducted comparative tests of the two major competing deacidification processes, established selection criteria, and began contract negotiations.
The Library Systems Steering Committee appointed a new Digital Imaging Infrastructure Subcommittee to consider issues of metadata, technical infrastructure, and service standards with specific attention to the three-year Imaging America project.
Subject headings in CATFILE are recombined for distribution in the conventional LCSH main heading, topical subheading, geographic and form subheading string rather than in the indexing like format now used in NLM's online file.
NLM's CIP and authority record covering the same period were submitted to the Library of Congress (LC) and made available through LC's record distribution service.
In April, NLM began distributing SERFILE, which replaces SERLINE, in MARC 21 format. The base file contained 110,000 serial records. SERFILE is now available for monthly ftp distribution.
The goals of next generation SERHOLD are to provide holdings data to support routing of ILL transactions, to improve the quality and timeliness of holdings data by empowering all SERHOLD participants to view and maintain data online, to facilitate the exchange of data by conforming to national standards (USMARC, ANSI/NISO Z39.71-199X), and to provide SERHOLD services and products in a resource effective manner.
The new system was previewed at the Medical Library Association meeting in May. NLM hopes to allow Regional Medical Libraries to test the new system in early Fall and to put the system into production by the end of the year.