Albert Camus was awarded the Nobel Prize in 1957 for having “illuminated
the problems of the human conscience in our times”. By mythologizing
the experiences of a secular age struggling with an increasingly contested
religious tradition, he dramatized the human effort to “live and
create without the aid of eternal values which, temporarily perhaps,
are absent or distorted in contemporary Europe”. Thus the challenge
posed by “the absurd” with which he is so universally identified.
Camus’ most celebrated work is L’Étranger (The Stranger).
Depicting the “metaphysical” awakening of an ordinary Algerian
worker, Camus concretizes the Pindarian injunction, provided as life’s
answer to “the absurd” in an epigram to Le Mythe de Sisyphe
(The Myth of Sisyphus): “Oh my soul do not aspire to immortal
heights but exhaust the field of the possible.” (Pindar, Pythian
iii)
But if the “absurd” defines our world, it was never treated
by Camus as a conclusion, only “a point of departure”: “What
else have I done except reason about an idea I discovered in the streets
of my time? That I have nourished this idea (and a part of me nourishes
it still) along with my whole generation goes without saying. I simply
set it far enough away so that I could deal with it and decide on its
logic.” How and what morality is still possible, then, in view
of the experience of “the death of God” which has given
birth to the experience of absurdity? While the absurd leaves humans
without justification and direction, rebellion bears witness to the
refusal of human beings to accept this incipient despair.
In “Absurdity and Suicide” Camus is clear on the problem
he is addressing: the meaning or meaninglessness of life. Therefore he
begins with a look at suicide. In “Absurd Walls” Camus explains
how traditional philosophies ultimately fail to comprehend the world’s
intrinsic “absurdity”. This gives Camus the opening he needs
in order to develop his “philosophy of the absurd”.