Psy 416: Reasoning and Problem Solving Fall 1998

Lecture 5: Concept Learning and Induction

1.  Induction and deduction—Two kinds of knowledge (?), empirical and analytical

    1. Induction: Uncertain, Generalizations from experience, Predictions of future experience. Induction is generally about trying to make sense out of data. Often thought of as going from specific to general, or specific to specific.
    2. Deduction: Certain, Conclusions from premises, Logical consequences of arguments, mathematical derivations. Often thought of as going from general statements to the specific events or statements or from general statements to general statements.
  • 2. Concepts or categories: Much of the research on induction presumes the concept of "concept."
      1. A concept is usually, but not always, identified by a noun or noun phrase, which is often thought to be definable by a set of properties.
      2. Properties (red, large, circle, alive, animal) are often operationalized as values of dimensions, such as color, size, number, etc.
      3. Some concepts may be simple, such as, 'red things'; some may consist of a conjunction of properties such as 'two red circles.' Sometimes a concept may be defined "disjunctively" such as a strike in baseball. Sometimes it's hard to identify the dimension to which a property belongs or to identify the set of necessary and sufficient features that identify a concept.
      4. Sometimes the best we can do is to identify whether an example is an exemplar of a concept probabalistically.
      5. Sometimes we may not be able to identify the dimensions or the features that define a concept with accuracy.
  • 3.  Associationistic approaches to Concept Formation (usually continuity)
      1. It is thought that concepts are learned primarily by being presented with an exemplar and learning whether it is a member of a particular concept or not. As the learner gets more and feedback from examples, she gets better and better at knowing which examples are category members or concept exemplars and which are notThese are seen to be values of some dimension.: dogs, red things, grammatical sentences, planets, a strike in baseball—Simple concepts, conjunctive concepts, disjunctive concepts.
      2. Hull’s Chinese character learning
      3. Kendler and transfer of training: reversal and nonreversal shifts.
      4. Frequency and probability of association are the primary principles of category learning.
  • 4.  Spence result of a conditioning experiment. Data supporting two kinds of processes. Are they continuity and discontinuity?
  • 5.  Hypothesis testing: Hypothetico-deductive approaches to Concept formation (usually noncontinuity)
      1. minimal effects of early trials on categorization: random to very good performance, non-efficacy of changing rule during learning phase.
      2. Bruner, Goodnow and Austin and strategies of concept attainment. Different people use different strategies to try to identify the correct concepts. These strategies are specific task related. Reception strategies (e.g., "Wholist" and "partist" ) and Selection strategies (e.g., "scanning" and "focusing").
      3. Strategy: There is a tendency for people to focus on confirmation of hypotheses and to pay attention to confirmatory rather than disconfirmatory evidence, although they can learn make use of information of all types.
  • 6.  Rule Induction: Experimental investigation of the consequences of operations: Finding functional relations between experimental setups and results.
  • 7.  Judgment under uncertainty: Kahneman and Tversky use of heuristics and their limitations.
      1. Availability
      2. similarity
     Return to Psy 416 syllabus