Irus Braverman

Conservation and hunting project

Tagged deer visiting bait site in Village of  Cayuga Heights Anasthesiologist prepares deer for sterilization surgery

Claims that hunters are exemplar conservationists would likely come as a surprise to many. Hunters, after all, kill animals. Isn't there a better way to appreciate wildlife than to kill and consume it? Yet there is no mistake: wildlife managers frequently make the claim that hunters, in the United States at least, are in fact some of the greatest conservationists. This article explores the complex historical and contemporary entanglements between hunting and wildlife conservation from a regulatory perspective. Such entanglements are multi-faceted: hunting provides substantial financial support for conservation and hunters are the primary tools for managing "big game" populations. Additionally, many wildlife officials are themselves hunters, and wildlife management programs are often geared toward the interests of hunters. Statutes, regulations, and governmental policies have been set in place that both reflect and reinforce this intimate relationship. This article draws on seven in depth, semi-structured interviews, mainly with government wildlife managers, as well as on my own participatory observations (hunting with a wildlife manager), to trace the interconnections between hunting and conservation and the detailed regulatory regimes that have emerged around them. The management of the white-tailed deer in New York State will serve as a case study for these explorations of how American wildlife officials think about, and practice, their work of governing wildlife hunting.


(2015). Conservation and Hunting: A Legal Ethnography of Deer Management. Journal of Land Use and Environmental Law 30: xx-xx.

Back to Homepage