Asteroid Collision
March 25, 1996
As
I suggested last week, your best chance to look for Comet Hyakutake will be
tonight and tomorrow night when it passes between the dippers. This evening it will be just below the
cup in the Little Dipper (Ursa Minor) and tomorrow it will be near Polaris, the
north star. It will then pass
Cassiopeia on Thursday and Friday.
During this entire time it will be brighter than any nearby star.
Despite
that brightness, Comet Hyakutake will wander through the Solar System about 8
million miles from our own planet, much less than the 93 million miles to the
sun.
But
what if it came closer? Indeed,
what if it smashed down through our atmosphere and struck the Earth?
My
concern about those questions led me to an interesting new book by John S.
Lewis, ³Rain of Iron and Ice: The Very Real Threat of Comet and Asteroid
Bombardment² (Addison-Wesley).
Despite Lewis¹ even-handed approach, he made me feel like Henny Penny
and her entourage who worried that the sky was falling.
Lewis
reviews scientific evidence of major earth impacts such as the Tungusta
explosion over Siberia in 1908; the three-quarter mile wide Winslow, Arizona
crater caused by a meteorite just 40 yards in diameter; the Caribbean asteroid
splash down 65 million years ago that may have ended the reign of the
dinosaurs; as well as hundreds of lesser strikes. He compares the violence of these episodes with other
natural disasters: the Krakatau explosion of 1883 off Indonesia, the 1737 earthquake-generated
tidal wave or tsunami as tall as a 21 story building that ran ashore on the
Russian Kamchatka Peninsula across the Bering Sea from Alaska, and our more
recent nuclear explosions.
These
terrestrial incidents pale in comparison with the results of the fall of a
large meteor. For example, Lewis
says, even a 10 yard diameter meteor would smash down with the force of over 40
kilotons of TNT, excavate a crater 300 yards in diameter, and demolish
everything within a mile of impact.
Lewis
then describes computer simulations of future asteroid impacts. His calculations provide average death
tolls from these collisions as high as 2450 per year, many times more than our
annual loss in aircraft crashes.
Even more disconcerting is the possibility of this average rising to
over 6000 per year.
What
should be done? Lewis offers a
number of suggestions.
First,
we should find and track the approximately 200,000 extremely threatening
objects (greater than 160 yards in diameter) at an annual international cost of
$30 million or about $22,000 each for the 1400 lives saved. He compares this with the billion
dollar cost of a single communication satellite.
Second,
we should employ atomic explosions or other means to nudge large asteroids
headed for earth out of their collision course. Once the catalog of threatening objects is completed, there
will be advance warning so that we can accomplish this economically.
Third,
we must accept the risk of impact by one the 200 million smaller but uncharted
bodies in near-earth orbit that still could explode with megaton force. Even though a Hiroshima-sized blast is
expected only once every thousand years, it could happen tomorrow.
Finally,
we should not wait until we have a catastrophe before initiating protective
measures.
Lewis¹
analysis is important. I hope his
message gets through to international legislators. His recommendations seem well worth the investment of our
tax dollars even though they won¹t give us full protection.
Henny Penny has indeed more to worry about than that acorn that fell on her head — and so do we all.