Use the MMR Vaccine
(This
1035th Buffalo Sunday News column was
first published on January 23, 2011.)
I
urge every parent to have your children vaccinated with the MMR (measles, mumps
and rubella) vaccine.
Wait
a minute, isn't that the inoculation that causes autism? No, it does not, but
there is an unfortunate story behind that belief.
In
1998, a team of British physicians led by Andrew Wakefield, associated MMR with
autism in an article in Lancet, the major British medical journal. The American
Journal of Gastroenterology then published Wakefield's follow-up article.
The
response to this publication was, as you might expect, widespread panic. News
spread rapidly and many parents refused to have their children inoculated. This
led to a rise in the number of measles cases.
Isn't
measles just one of those brief episode childhood diseases? Hardly. Each year
worldwide an estimated half-million people, mostly children, die of this highly
contagious disease. A 1989-1991 epidemic in this country led to 132 deaths.
A
follow-up study in 2004 by other researchers failed to confirm Wakefield's
results and that same year British newspaper reporter Brian Deer identified
serious problems with Wakefield's work. Deer found that several of the twelve
children in Wakefield's study had been recruited by a lawyer who was preparing
a suit against MMR manufacturers and that litigation lawyers had not only
supported Wakefield's research but they had paid him personally over $600,000.
British
television broadcast a documentary based on Deer's claims, including two
additional disclosures: no measles virus had been found in any Wakefield's
subjects and Wakefield was seeking a patent for his own competing vaccine.
Wakefield
promptly sued the television station for libel.
That
just made things worse. The TV lawyers countered that Wakefield had dishonestly
and irresponsibly spread fear that the MMR vaccine might cause autism in some
children, "even though he knew that his own laboratory's tests
dramatically contradicted his claims," and that he had been unremittingly
evasive and dishonest as a cover-up.
As the court case dragged on, the United Kingdom
General Medical Council examined professional misconduct
charges against Wakefield and two of his co-authors of the Lancet paper. In
January 2010, the council ruled against Wakefield on all issues, stating that
he had "failed in his duties as a responsible consultant", acted
against the interests of his patients, and acted "dishonestly and
irresponsibly" in his research. Five months later Wakefield's and
co-author John Walker-Smith's licenses to practice medicine in the United
Kingdom were rescinded.
Meanwhile,
the journals withdrew support of Wakefield's articles and an investigation into
his other publications was initiated. Ten of his co-authors withdrew their
support of his findings. Forced by the mounting evidence against him to
withdraw his libel suit, Wakefield was ordered by the court to pay the
defendant's legal costs.
Just
days ago a British Medical Journal editorial stated, "Clear evidence of
falsification of data should now close the door on this damaging vaccine scare.
Who perpetrated this fraud? There is no doubt that it was Wakefield. Is it
possible that he was wrong, but not dishonest: that he was so incompetent that
he was unable to fairly describe the project, or to report even one of the 12
childrenŐs cases accurately? No. A great deal of thought and effort must have
gone into drafting the paper to achieve the results he wanted: the
discrepancies all led in one direction; misreporting was gross."
Unfortunately,
the damage has been done. Now comes the saddest part. Will the evidence correct
this situation? I think not. Anyone suffering seeks a cause. When I was
hospitalized as a child, I asked my roommate, a polio patient, if he knew what
caused his affliction. "I ate green apples," he told me. The
association of the MMR vaccine with autism is of the same category. Proximity
does not indicate causality.
Wakefield's
book, "Callous Disregard", claims that he is being mistreated. Now
living in this country, he has gained support for his cause from attractive
model Jenny McCarthy whose son has autism. While I empathize with McCarthy and
her child, I consider Wakefield's cause a cruel distraction.
There
are rare reactions to vaccines (information may be downloaded from the Centers
for Disease Control website), but the alternative, not being vaccinated,
represents a far more serious threat.
Please
protect your children with this vaccine.-- Gerry Rising